Source code for plainbox.impl.censoREd
"""
This module is the result of an evening of frustration caused by the need to
support Python 3.2 and a failing doctest that exercises, unintentionally, the
behavior of the compiled regular expression object's __repr__() method. That
should be something we can fix, right? Let's not get crazy here:
>>> import re
>>> sre_cls = type(re.compile(""))
>>> sre_cls
<class '_sre.SRE_Pattern'>
Aha, we have a nice type. It's only got a broken __repr__ method that sucks.
But this is Python, we can fix that? Right?
>>> sre_cls.__repr__ = (
... lambda self: "re.compile({!r})".format(self.pattern))
... # doctest: +NORMALIZE_WHITESPACE
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: can't set attributes of built-in/extension
type '_sre.SRE_Pattern'
Hmm, okay, so let's try something else:
>>> class Pattern(sre_cls):
... def __repr__(self):
... return "re.compile({!r})".format(self.pattern)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: type '_sre.SRE_Pattern' is not an acceptable base type
*Sigh*, denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance
https://twitter.com/zygoon/status/560088469192843264
The last resort, aka, the proxy approach. Let's use a bit of magic to work
around the problem. This way we won't have to subclass or override anything.
"""
from plainbox.impl.proxy import proxy
from plainbox.impl.proxy import unproxied
__all__ = ["PatternProxy"]
[docs]class PatternProxy(proxy):
"""
A proxy that overrides the __repr__() to match what Python 3.3+ providers
on the internal object representing a compiled regular expression.
>>> import re
>>> sre_cls = type(re.compile(""))
>>> pattern = PatternProxy(re.compile("profanity"))
Can we have a repr() like in Python3.4 please?
>>> pattern
re.compile('profanity')
Does it still work like a normal pattern object?
>>> pattern.match("profanity") is not None
True
>>> pattern.match("love") is not None
False
**Yes** (gets another drink).
"""
@unproxied
def __repr__(self):
return "re.compile({!r})".format(self.pattern)