# Mocha Maintainer's Handbook

<!-- toc -->

- [Introduction](#introduction)
- [Terminology](#terminology)
  - [User](#user)
  - [Contributor](#contributor)
    - [A Note About Donations](#a-note-about-donations)
  - [Maintainer](#maintainer)
    - [The Responsibilities of a Maintainer](#the-responsibilities-of-a-maintainer)
    - [The Rights of a Maintainer](#the-rights-of-a-maintainer)
    - [About "Owners"](#about-owners)
- [Mocha's Decision-Making Process](#mochas-decision-making-process)
- [Communication](#communication)
- [Working with Issues & Pull Requests](#working-with-issues--pull-requests)
  - [Semantic Versioning](#semantic-versioning)
  - [Questions](#questions)
  - [Bugs](#bugs)
  - [Features](#features)
  - [Subsystems, Environments, Etc.](#subsystems-environments-etc)
  - [Feedback & Follow-ups](#feedback--follow-ups)
  - [Meta](#meta)
  - [Closing Issues](#closing-issues)
- [Commenting on Issues and Reviewing Pull Requests](#commenting-on-issues-and-reviewing-pull-requests)
  - [Reviewing Code](#reviewing-code)
  - [The Part About Jerks](#the-part-about-jerks)
    - [Rude or Entitled People](#rude-or-entitled-people)
    - [Code of Conduct Violations](#code-of-conduct-violations)
- [Branches](#branches)
- [Merging PRs](#merging-prs)
  - [Using Milestones](#using-milestones)
- [Mocha's Release Process](#mochas-release-process)
- [Projects](#projects)
- [About The JS Foundation](#about-the-js-foundation)
- [About OpenCollective](#about-opencollective)

<!-- tocstop -->

## Introduction

Hi stranger! We've written this document for:

1. Active maintainers of Mocha
1. Prospective maintainers of Mocha
1. Anyone curious about how Mocha's maintainers maintain Mocha

The purpose of this document is to _describe our processes_. We want to avoid conflicts and confusion around "unwritten rules". In our opinion, the most straightforward way to address this is to _write them down_. This _also_ happens to be the most straightforward way to change them!

To assist in eliminating ambiguity, we will define some terms.

## Terminology

Anyone involved with Mocha will fall into one of these buckets: **user**, **contributor**, and **maintainer**.

### User

A "user" for the purpose of this document is any _individual developer_ who consumes Mocha to write and/or execute tests. A user interacts with contributors. A user interacts with the software, web site, documentation, etc., which these contributors provide.

As a user, you're expected to follow the [code of conduct](https://github.com/mochajs/mocha/blob/master/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) when interacting in Mocha's "official" social spaces. This includes:

- Any chatroom under the `mochajs` organization on Gitter
- Any project under the `mochajs` organization on GitHub
- The MochaJS Google Group
- Any future social, in-person or online events which Mocha might organize

### Contributor

This is the most important thing:

**You don't have to write code to be a contributor!**

A "contributor" is any individual who has _given back_ in some way to the project and its community. Contributions include (but are not limited to):

1. Reporting bugs which follow the reporting guidelines
1. Suggesting and debating enhancements that have wide applicability
1. Helping others with Mocha-related questions on [Gitter](https://gitter.im/mochajs/mocha), [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com), Google groups, or other sites
1. Sending pull requests which fix bugs, improve documentation, improve developer experience, improve code quality, and/or implement requested enhancements
1. Reviewing code on pull requests
1. Providing design assets
1. Posting a tutorial on a personal blog or blogging site
1. Suggesting usages for project funds
1. Organizing a "Mocha-branded" event or workshop
1. Recruiting more contributors! Don't spam.
1. Researching the user base, getting feedback, etc. Don't spam.

A contributor is _usually_ a user as well, but this isn't a hard-and-fast rule. A contributor is also expected to adhere to the [code of conduct](https://github.com/mochajs/mocha/blob/master/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) as a user would.

As you can see, it's wide open! Think of it another way: if you are _adding value to Mocha_, then you are a contributor.

> Due to the nature of GitHub, it's a challenge to recognize those who've made contributions _elsewhere_ on the web, or even contributions of the "non-code" variety. If you know of any great contributions which have gone unnoticed, please bring them to the maintainers' attention!

#### A Note About Donations

A [donation](https://opencollective.com/mochajs) is also a great way to help Mocha if you want to help sustain OSS, but can't find time to contribute in other ways, or just want to say "thanks!"

We love our backers and sponsors! 💕

### Maintainer

A maintainer has certain "rights" (or "permissions") to the Mocha project and other projects under the `mochajs` organization. There's no way to dance around this: with these rights come increased responsibilities.

However, **there is no expectation of a standard of technical ability** to be a maintainer of Mocha. This doesn't imply a lack of technical oversight--every pull request will eventually be reviewed.

**If you think you aren't experienced enough to maintain a project like Mocha, you are incorrect.** The only requirements are the above responsibilities and a desire to help the project. It bears repeating:

**You don't have to write code to be a maintainer!**

> Maintainer is synonymous with "Collaborator" and/or "Owner" in GitHub parlance.

#### The Responsibilities of a Maintainer

As a maintainer, you are expected to _not just_ "follow" the code of conduct, but embody its values. Your public behavior, whether in the physical or virtual world, reflects upon the project and other maintainers.

> If you don't understand the code of conduct, or why it exists, it is _your responsibility_ to educate yourself.
> This does not imply the CoC is immutable.

Furthermore, a maintainer is a contributor who **contributes regularly**, or expresses a _desire to do so._ That could be every day--but it might be once a week, or even once a month. Your boss doesn't work here; contribute as often as you wish. We are all people with Real Lives, and for many of us, contributing to OSS is just a hobby!

Finally, a maintainer must help define what makes Mocha "Mocha". At minimum, a maintainer must _understand_ the current definition (if a maintainer is not interested in decision-making). Some of these questions include:

- What's the scope of Mocha?
- Where should we focus efforts?
- What's urgent, what can wait?
- What can we break? What's off-limits?
- What user feedback is valuable? What isn't?

As maintainers, _we work together_ to learn about the nature of these questions. If we try hard enough, we even come to some answers!

A maintainer _must_ also have 2FA enabled on their GitHub account.

> If you think that you aren't familiar with mocha's internals enough to contribute, please watch [This walkthrough video!](https://youtu.be/zLayCLcIno0)

#### The Rights of a Maintainer

You may choose to do zero or more of these _at their discretion_:

- Merge pull requests
- Modify issues (closing, adding labels, assigning them other maintainers, etc.)
- Modify GitHub [Projects](https://github.com/mochajs/mocha/projects)
- Cancel builds, restart jobs, or otherwise interact with our CI server(s)
- CRUD operations on GitHub integrations
- Participate in the decision-making process
- Add new maintainers to the team
- Tag releases and publish Mocha to npm

> While maintainers have the ability to commit directly to the `master` branch, _this is to be avoided_ if any other maintainer could reasonably take issue with the change, or the change affects Mocha's API or output. For example, a spelling correction in `CHANGELOG.md` may not require a pull request. A change to a reporter's output most certainly would! Maintainers are trusted to use their best judgement; if unsure, err on the side of caution.

#### About "Owners"

Some maintainers will have full admin rights to the [mochajs org](https://github.com/mochajs) and/or will have access to publish to npm.

- Those with publish access are expected to use npm's 2FA.
- This level of access will be granted by the current owners to those maintainers who have earned the project's trust.

## Mocha's Decision-Making Process

Mocha follows a [consensus-seeking decision-making](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making) process. In other words, all maintainers attempt to come to agreement. If that fails, we decide by a simple vote.

Active maintainers will make an effort to solicit feedback from others before making important or potentially controversial decisions. Given the varying geographical distribution and availability of the maintenance team, we resolve to do the best we can to solicit feedback.

In other words, to have your opinion heard, participate regularly. The rest of the team won't wait on feedback that isn't necessarily forthcoming!

## Communication

Maintainers will mainly gather in [the mochajs/contributors channel](https://gitter.im/mochajs/contributors). This is a _public_ channel, and _anyone_ can join.
Videoconference (or audio) calls may happen on a regular or irregular basis, as schedules allow. This is mainly because we have Real Lives and time zones suck.

## Working with Issues & Pull Requests

All new issues will need to be triaged, and pull requests must be examined. Maintainers must understand [Semantic Versioning](http://semver.org) ("SemVer"), as Mocha follows it strictly.

> If you see an issue or PR that could use some labels, please add them!

### Semantic Versioning

The TL;DR of Semantic Versioning is:

- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and
- PATCH version when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes.

Pull requests _must_ have one of these three (3) labels:

- `semver-patch` for backwards-compatible bug fixes, documentation, or anything which does not affect a "production" (`npm install mocha`) installation of Mocha
- `semver-minor` for backwards-compatible new features or usability/interface enhancements
- `semver-major` for backwards-incompatible ("breaking") changes to the API

A PR which introduces a breaking change is considered to be `semver-major`, _regardless_ of whether it's a bug fix, feature, or whatever.

For the purposes of the above definitions, Mocha has some unique considerations, and includes the following in its definition of "API":

1. Mocha's _documented_, programmatic interface which _is not explicitly tagged with `@private`_
1. Mocha's machine-readable reporter output
1. Mocha's default settings
1. Mocha's command-line options
1. The environments which Mocha supports; this includes:
   1. Browser versions
   1. Node.js versions
   1. Compatibility with popular module loaders (e.g., AMD)

**Err on the side of the user; breaking changes to private APIs will be `semver-major`, if and only if they are known to be consumed by actively developed project(s).**

Examples of a breaking changes might be:

- Throwing an `Error` where one wasn't thrown before
- Removing a command-line option or alias
- Removing an environment from the CI configuration
- Changing the default reporter!
- Changing defaults in a way which would cause tests which were previously successful to start failing, or a failing test to start passing
  - The exception is fixing likely false-positives
  - A good example would be changing the default `timeout` value

### Questions

Support questions should be answered if possible, but the user should be directed to the chat room, StackOverflow, or Google Groups for further help, _if_ it is indeed a Mocha-related issue.

If it's _not_ a Mocha problem (people tend not to believe this), you may want to show a counter-example. It's often helpful to direct the issue author to the responsible project, if you can determine what that is.

- `faq`: Issues which are _repeatedly_ asked support questions or misunderstandings. This may also apply to questions which receive a lot of 👍's
- `question`: Add this label if it's just a support question

### Bugs

- `confirmed-bug`: A confirmed bug
- `unconfirmed-bug`: A maintainer has not yet or cannot reproduce; typically `needs-feedback` follows (see "Feedback & Follow-ups" below)
- `invalid`: Not a bug. Close the issue.
- `wontfix`: A bug, but for Reasons, it won't get fixed.

### Features

- `feature`: Any feature/enhancement that's up for discussion or has been agreed upon.
- `wontfix`: A half-baked feature or one which is unsuitable or out-of-scope for Mocha.

### Subsystems, Environments, Etc.

- `reporter`: Usually concerning Mocha's output
- `browser`: Issues unique to a browser environment
- `documentation`: Issues around incorrect or missing docs
- `qa`: Issues around Mocha's own test suite
- `chore`: Refactors, CI tweaks, dependencies, etc.
- `developer-experience`: Issues which will make it easier to contribute and maintain Mocha

### Feedback & Follow-ups

Issues or PRs which require action or feedback from a _specific_ maintainer, should have that item _assigned_ to them.

- `needs-feedback`: Issues which _need feedback from the original author_. Will automatically become `stale` (see "Meta" section below)
- `needs-review`: For _pull requests only_; PRs which need a maintainer to inspect and/or merge them

### Meta

- `stale`: The "stalebot" marks things as stale and will close issues if they need feedback but haven't received any. Comment on an issue to prevent this from happening.
- `help wanted`: If it's an issue that is not a high priority for the maintenance team, use this label to solicit contributions. Note lack of `-` in this label's name.
- `good-first-issue`: Typically combined with `help wanted`; an issue that new contributors to Mocha may find straightforward.

### Closing Issues

Write "closes #<ISSUE>" or "resolves #<ISSUE>" in a commit or PR to have the original issue closed automatically once the PR is merged.

For any issue which is a duplicate, write "duplicate of #<ISSUE>" in a new comment, and close the issue. [Read more about marking issues as duplicates](https://help.github.com/articles/about-duplicate-issues-and-pull-requests/).

If the issue is a support question, and you believe it has been answered, close the issue.

If the issue is not Mocha-related, and/or a bug cannot be confirmed, label it `invalid` and close.

## Commenting on Issues and Reviewing Pull Requests

**All maintainers should be courteous and kind.** Thank the external contributor for the pull request, even if it is not merged. If the pull request has been opened (and subsequently closed) without discussion in a corresponding issue, let them know that by creating an issue first, they could have saved wasted effort. _Clearly and objectively_ explain the reasoning for rejecting any PR.

If you need more information in an issue, nicely ask the user to provide it. Remind them to use the issue/PR templates if they have not. If the user never gets around to it, the "stalebot" will close it eventually anyhow.

### Reviewing Code

Use GitHub's code review features. Requesting a review from another maintainer _may or may not_ actually result in a review; don't wait on it. If the PR cannot move forward without input from a certain maintainer, _assign them to the PR_.

### The Part About Jerks

There will be jerks.

#### Rude or Entitled People

These are users who feel the Mocha project and its maintainers _owe them_ time or support. This is incorrect.

However, this behavior is often indicative of someone who is "new" to open source. Many just don't know better. It is not your _responsibility_ to educate them (again, you owe them nothing).

Here are some suggestions:

1. If u mad, wait 20 minutes before writing a comment.
1. "Kill them with kindness". Explain how they are presenting themselves; maybe link to a good article or two about it.
1. Don't make it about "users vs. maintainers". Treat them like a potential future maintainer.
1. Avoid adding to the drama. You could try to reach out privately; email may be in their GitHub profile. You will likely never hear from that individual again (problem solved)
1. If an issue is getting out of control, lock it.
1. If someone is _repeatedly_ rude and does not correct their mistakes, you may ban them from participating in the `mochajs` org. If you do not have permission to do so, contact one which does (an "owner").

#### Code of Conduct Violations

**This section is theoretical, as it's yet to happen**.

1. Inform the individual of the violation; link to the CoC
1. Follow up with JS Foundation for further guidance
1. Repeated violators will be banned inasmuch as that is technically possible
1. No maintainer nor contributor is exempt from the CoC

## Branches

`master` is the only maintained branch in `mochajs/mocha` or any of the other repos. **`master` is the only branch to which force-pushing is disallowed.**

Maintainers may push new branches to a repo, as long as they remove them when finished (merging a PR will prompt to do so).

Please _please_ **_please_** delete old or unused branches.

## Merging PRs

GitHub has several options for how to merge a PR. Here's what we do:

1. _If a PR has multiple commits_, "Squash".
1. _If a PR has a single commit_, "Rebase".
1. Don't "Merge".

**Upon acceptance of a PR, you must assign it a milestone.**

### Using Milestones

If you know that the PR is breaking, assign it to a new or existing milestone correlating with the next major release. For example, if Mocha's current version is v6.5.2, then this milestone would be named `v7.0.0`.

Likewise, if the PR is `semver-minor`, create or use a new milestone correlating to the next _minor_ release, e.g., `v6.6.0`.

If it's unclear what the next milestone will be, use or create a milestone named `next`. This milestone will be renamed to the new version at release time.

By using milestones, we can cherry-pick non-breaking changes into minor or patch releases, and keep `master` as the latest version.

**This is subject to change, hopefully.**

## Mocha's Release Process

_It's easier to release often._

1. Decide whether this is a `patch`, `minor`, or `major` release.
1. Checkout `master` in your working copy & pull.
1. Modify `CHANGELOG.md`; follow the existing conventions in that file. Use the "pull request" number, unless there isn't one. _You do not need to add Markdown links; this is done automatically._
   1. You can omit stuff from `CHANGELOG.md` that was done by a maintainer, but would have no interest to consumers of Mocha.
   1. If the changes aren't of interest to consumers but _were not_ made by a maintainer, reference them anyway. It's cool to give attribution!
1. Use `npm version` (use `npm@6+`) to bump the version; see `npm version --help` for more info. (Hint--use `-m`: e.g., `npm version patch -m 'Release v%s'`)
   1. This command will update the list of authors (from the Git history) in `AUTHORS`, and add GitHub links to `CHANGELOG.md`.
   1. These changes are then added to the Git "stage" and will be added to the commit.
1. Push `master` to `origin` with your new tag; e.g. `git push origin master --tags`
1. Copy & paste the `CHANGELOG.md` lines to a new GitHub "release". Save release as draft.
1. Meanwhile, you can check [the build](https://travis-ci.org/mochajs/mocha) on Travis-CI and [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/mochajs/mocha/actions?query=workflow%3A%22Windows+CI%22).
   1. Once the build is green, you'll want to trigger an update of `mochajs.org`:
   1. _If you're doing a prerelease_, fast-forward the `next` branch to `master`, and push it. This updates [https://next.mochajs.org](https://next.mochajs.org). That's all.
   1. _If this is NOT a prerelease_, fast-forward the `mochajs.org` branch to `master` and push it. This updates [https://mochajs.org](https://mochajs.org).
   1. _If this is a "final" release_ (the first release of a major _after_ one or more prereleases) then remove the `next` tag from npm via `npm dist-tag rm next`.
1. Finally, you're satisfied with the release notes, open your draft release on GitHub, then click "publish."
1. Back in your working copy, run `npm publish`. _If you're doing a prerelease, ensure that you use `--tag=next`._
1. Announce the update on Twitter or just tell your dog or something. New releases will be automatically tweeted by [@b0neskull](https://twitter.com/b0neskull) via a feed subscription to Mocha's "releases" page on GitHub.

_Note: there are too many steps above._

## About The JS Foundation

The [JS Foundation](https://js.foundation) retains copyright of all projects underneath the [mochajs org](https://github.com/mochajs). The Foundation does not influence technical decisions nor the project roadmap. It is, however, charged with ensuring the continued vitality and sustainability of projects under its banner.

As a maintainer, you have access to the resources the JS Foundation provides.

## About OpenCollective

Mocha collects donations [via OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/mochajs). As a maintainer, you may help decide how the funds are used. These decisions are made via a consensus-seeking process, much like any other decision.

Expense transparency is built in to OpenCollective.

---

Questions? Ask in the [contributors' chat room](https://gitter.im/mochajs/contributors)!
